Chanukah is the oil miracle. So why is the oil missing from this prayer?
Read the Chanukah paragraph again. It has the Greek kingdom, the Torah, a war, a cleaned-out Temple, and lamps lit in the courtyards. It does not have the jar of oil. The word oil is not there at all.
The Gemara has the opposite problem. Asked "What is Chanukah?" it answers with the oil. The Greeks made all the oil in the Temple impure. The Hasmonean kingdom (the family known as the Maccabees) won. They found one jar still sealed with the High Priest's seal, enough for one day, and it burned for eight. The war gets one clause.
The Rambam (Maimonides, the great medieval codifier of Jewish law, died 1204) tells both in order: the war first, then the oil. He does not choose between them.
One explanation for why the holiday points to the lights comes from the Meshech Chochma (a Torah commentary by Rabbi Meir Simcha of Dvinsk, who died in 1926). He builds on a verse in Mishlei (Proverbs): "When your enemy falls, do not rejoice." Other nations make a holiday of their victory day. Israel does not make a holiday of an enemy's fall. So Chanukah points to lighting the Temple and purifying it. The Hasmonean leaders were also priests, he says, and God showed them a sign inside the Temple that only priests knew about, so they could not say their own strength had won.
He says Purim works the same way. The Megillah fixes it on "the days when the Jews rested from their enemies," not on the day of the fighting.
That is one reading. The prayer does include the victory: "You handed the strong into the hands of the weak." But it ends on the Temple and the lamps. Abudarham says that in his day the common people skipped the last part, "And afterward Your children came to the inner room of Your house." He says to say it, because it is "the essence of the miracle."
Shabbat 21b,Rambam, Laws of Megillah and Chanukah 3:1-2,Meshech Chochma, Parashat Bo,Mishlei 24:17,Esther 9:22,Abudarham, ChanukahWere the Maccabees really the good guys?
The prayer is clear. It names Matityahu and his sons, and says God stood by them when the Greek kingdom tried to make Israel forget the Torah. The Rambam agrees. He says the sons of the Hasmoneans, who were High Priests, overcame the Greeks and saved the Jews, then set up a king from among the priests. Jewish rule returned for more than 200 years, until the Second Temple was destroyed.
Later commentators are less comfortable. The Ramban (Rabbi Moshe ben Nachman, a Torah commentator in Spain, died around 1270) calls the Hasmoneans "saints of the Most High" and says that without them the Torah and its commandments would have been forgotten in Israel. Even so, they were punished heavily. Their mistake, he says, was ruling when they were not from Yehuda and the house of David. He also suggests that priests should not rule at all.
He points to how the family ended. The four sons of Matityahu who ruled one after another all fell to their enemies. The Gemara tells of Herod, who had been a slave of the Hasmonean house. He killed his masters and spared one young woman of the family. She climbed to the roof, called out, "Whoever says, 'I come from the house of the Hasmoneans,' is a slave," and fell to the ground. The Ramban quotes that line as proof.
Abudarham makes a similar point inside his commentary on this prayer. The Hasmoneans were pious, he writes, but as priests they took the crown "not as they should have," and Herod, a slave from their household, wiped out their family.
So how can the prayer thank God for them? The prayer itself stops at the Temple and the lamps. It does not praise the family's later rule. It thanks God for what He did: He stood with them in their trouble. Notice that the Rambam puts God first in his own sentence: "until the God of our ancestors had mercy on them and saved them, and the sons of the Hasmoneans overcame." What to think of the family is left open.
Rambam, Laws of Megillah and Chanukah 3:1,Ramban on Bereishit 49:10,Bava Batra 3b,Abudarham, ChanukahThe Megillah never names God. Why does the prayer give Him the credit?
In the Megillah, a king signs a decree, a queen risks her life, and Haman ends up on the gallows. God is never named. The Purim paragraph tells the same events and says it plainly: "And You, in Your great mercy, canceled his plan, ruined his scheme, and paid him back on his own head." Each of those verbs has God as its subject.
Did the sages notice the silence? The Gemara comes close. It asks where Esther is hinted at in the Torah, and answers with a verse where God says, "I will surely hide My face" (Devarim 31:18). The Gemara gives only the verse. The word astir, "I will hide," sounds like Esther.
The Megillah itself leaves one clue. When Mordechai warns Esther, he says relief "will arise for the Jews from another place" (Esther 4:14). A midrash (an old collection of Torah teachings) uses that verse to say that God will not abandon Israel and will raise up a redeemer one way or another. Another midrash says that wherever the Megillah says just "the king," it can mean the human king or God.
Abudarham goes through the Purim paragraph the way he goes through the Chanukah one, tying its words to verses. "You canceled his plan" goes with "He thwarts the designs of the crafty" (Iyov, or Job, 5:12), said about God. "Paid him back on his own head" goes with "As you did, so will it be done to you; your payback will return on your head" (Ovadiah, or Obadiah, 1:15), said about Esav, Haman's ancestor. He adds that God paid Haman back measure for measure.
Now look at the Megillah's own words about Haman's end. The king orders that his evil plan "shall return on his head" (Esther 9:25). In the Megillah, the king gives the order. The prayer says: "You returned." It names God as the one who did it.
Whether you hear that as the plain meaning of the Megillah or as the sages' way of reading it, the prayer takes a side. It says who it believes was behind the reversal.
Chullin 139b,Devarim 31:18,Esther 4:14; Esther 9:25,Esther Rabbah 8:6 and 3:10,Abudarham, Purim