Why does it pile up fifteen words in a row, all starting with "and"? Isn't that filler?
After "true," the prayer runs through fifteen words in one breath, and every one starts with "and": firm, established, lasting, upright, trustworthy, beloved, dear, desirable, pleasant, awe-inspiring, mighty, well-ordered, accepted, good, beautiful. Read fast, it sounds like someone who ran out of ideas and kept going.
Abudarham ties each word to a verse where the Tanach uses that word. "Established" is from Devarim 17:4, where a matter is investigated carefully and found "true, established." "Lasting" is tied to Yeshayahu 40:8: "the word of our God will stand forever." "Upright" is from Tehillim 33:4: "the word of Hashem is upright." "Desirable" is from Tehillim 19:11, about the laws of Hashem: "more desirable than gold."
What is all this describing? Abudarham says it is the Shema. The next words, "this matter for us, forever and ever," point back to what you just said. So the list is an answer to the Shema, in words taken from the Tanach.
He also lines up the fifteen with other sets of fifteen (see the note on the first line; the Yishtabach page tells the same match). He does not say what the match is for.
Not every book counts the same. The Machzor Vitry (an early prayer book from France) counts thirteen of these words, then five more affirmations after them, eighteen in all. The sources leave open why these words, in this order. What Abudarham does give is a verse in the Tanach for every word in the list.
Abudarham, Blessings on the Shema,Devarim 17:4,Yeshayahu 40:8,Tehillim 33:4 and 19:11,Machzor Vitry, Order of Maariv 101Why is the morning blessing "firm" and the night one "faithful"?
The evening has its own version, Emet Ve'emunah, "true and faithful." The Gemara reports a teaching in the name of Rav (a leading teacher in Babylonia): whoever skips Emet Veyatziv in the morning or Emet Ve'emunah at night has not fulfilled the duty. His proof is a verse: "To tell Your kindness in the morning and Your faithfulness at night" (Tehillim 92:3). Abudarham and the Tur (a law code from Spain, 1300s) read that as "has not done it the way it was set up." The person still did his duty, they say, because skipping a blessing does not undo the Shema.
Why kindness for morning and faithfulness for night? Rashi (the classic commentator, France, died 1105) says the morning blessing is entirely about the kindness God did for our ancestors, taking them out of Egypt and splitting the sea. The night blessing also speaks about what we still wait for: that God will keep His promise to redeem us. So the morning looks back, and the night adds what we still hope for.
Abudarham adds two more explanations. On the night before the Exodus, Israel trusted God's promise to take them out in the morning, and He kept it, so the night is for trust and the morning for the promise kept. And some say that at night we leave our souls with God and trust He will return them, and in the morning His word proves true. The Tur gives that one too.
The Machzor Vitry (an early prayer book from France) tells the soul version as a story. At night the soul goes up to the sky. It does not want to come back until God tells it to go back, because the person trusted Him and left the soul with Him. God keeps that trust, returns the soul, and in the morning renews the person's strength. Then it quotes Eichah 3:23: "They are new every morning; great is Your faithfulness." The last two words end Modeh Ani too.
The Gemara itself gives only the verse. The rest are later explanations, listed side by side without choosing one.
Berakhot 12a,Rashi on Berakhot 12a,Tehillim 92:3,Abudarham, Blessings on the Shema,Tur, Orach Chaim 66,Machzor Vitry, Order of Maariv 101,Eichah 3:23The Shema already ends with Egypt. Why does the next blessing go back to it?
The last paragraph of the Shema ends: "I am Hashem your God, who took you out of the land of Egypt to be your God. I am Hashem your God" (Bamidbar 15:41). The blessing starts right there. Abudarham gives that as the reason for what comes next: since the third paragraph of the Shema ended with the Exodus, the main part of the blessing after it is the telling of the Exodus.
This page gives the frame: all of this is true, and God is our King. The telling itself comes in the lines right after: Egypt, the sea, the firstborn. The Shema names Egypt in one phrase. The blessing is where the story gets told.
Why must it be said at all? The Torah says to remember the day you left Egypt "all the days of your life" (Devarim 16:3). In Berakhot 21a, Rav Yehudah teaches (Abudarham quotes it in Shmuel's name): if you are unsure whether you said the Shema, do not say it again. If you are unsure whether you said Emet Veyatziv, say it again. The reason given is that the Shema is only a rabbinic rule, but Emet Veyatziv is from the Torah. Rashi explains that this is because it mentions the Exodus.
That is one opinion, and the Gemara pushes back. Rav Yosef points to the Torah's words in the Shema, "when you lie down and when you rise." Abaye answers that those words are about studying Torah, not reciting the Shema. Abudarham says three scholars from about 1,000 years ago, Rabbeinu Hai, Rabbeinu Chananel and the Rif, ruled that the Shema is from the Torah too. He adds a limit: if you are unsure whether you said this blessing but know you said the Shema, including the tzitzit paragraph, you have already remembered Egypt and do not say it again.
Bamidbar 15:41,Abudarham, Blessings on the Shema,Devarim 16:3,Berakhot 21a,Rashi on Berakhot 21a