Swords, revenge, kings in chains. Why is this in my morning prayers?
Five verses of singing and dancing. Then a two-edged sword, vengeance on the nations, and kings in iron chains. The classic commentators do not skip these lines. They also do not all read them the same way.
Start with when. The note printed above the psalm in the siddur says it speaks about the future, the coming of the Mashiach. Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Radak and Meiri all read it that way. It describes the end of history. None of them reads it as an instruction for today.
Radak (Rabbi David Kimchi, Provence, around 1200) takes the sword as a real sword. In the last war, the war of Gog and Magog, Israel will go out with prayer in their mouths and a sword in their hands.
Rashi (the classic commentator, France, died 1105) reads the verse differently. The praises in their throats are the two-edged sword. Midrash Tehillim (a collection of rabbinic teachings on Tehillim) says it in one line: the mouth of Israel is their sword. God says: you raise Me up, and I fight the war for you.
And the vengeance? The Midrash asks which vengeance is meant, and answers with a verse: for the spilled blood of Your servants. It adds that this is not a person's vengeance. It is God's. Then it asks whether ordinary people are the target. God answers no, only the kings, and the next verse does name kings and nobles.
The last verse calls it "the written verdict." Rashi: a sentence that a prophet already wrote down. Ibn Ezra (a Spanish commentator who died in the 1160s) says what the vengeance is for: to bring the nations back to serve God "shoulder to shoulder," a phrase from the prophet Tzefanyah, in the days of the Mashiach.
The Romemu prayer, earlier this morning, has a hard question of its own on "God of vengeance." The Gemara's answer there was short: in its place, vengeance is great. None of the readings here deletes the sword, and Radak keeps it real. What they share is the timing: the end of history, not now.
Siddur Sefard, weekday Shacharit,Rashi on Tehillim 149:6 and 149:9,Radak on Tehillim 149:6,Ibn Ezra on Tehillim 149:7,Meiri on Tehillim 149:1,Midrash Tehillim 149,Tzefanyah 3:9,Berakhot 33aHow is it a "new song" if I say the same words every morning?
The psalm tells you to sing a new song. Then you read the same nine verses you read yesterday. It is a fair thing to notice.
Radak (Rabbi David Kimchi, Provence, around 1200) reads the first verse closely. He explains: the songs that are already written will not be enough for them. They will make up a new one. On his reading, the psalm is not calling itself the new song. It is a call for a song that does not exist yet.
Why would the old songs stop being enough? Midrash Tehillim (a collection of rabbinic teachings on Tehillim) quotes the prophet Yeshayahu: "I am doing something new." Then God says: just as I make new things, you say a new song to Me. Meiri (Rabbi Menachem Meiri, Provence, around 1300) says that the time itself will be called new, because of the wonders in it.
The Mekhilta (an early Midrash on Shemot) notices the grammar. Hebrew has two words for a song: shirah, which is feminine, and shir, which is masculine. The Mekhilta says every song of the past is called shirah. Its reason is a comparison to giving birth: each of those rescues was followed by new subjugation. The rescue of the future is called by the masculine word, because no subjugation comes after it.
You say both words every morning. Just before the Amidah, the siddur says shirah chadashah: the people rescued at the sea praised God with a new song. That one happened. Here the words are shir chadash. Tosafot (the medieval commentaries printed alongside the Gemara) use this same Mekhilta to set the wording of the Haggadah on Seder night: shirah chadashah in the line that leads into Hallel, and shir chadash in the line about the redemption still to come.
So on these readings, saying the same words every day is what you would expect. The new song belongs to a day that has not come, and nobody has written it yet.
Radak on Tehillim 149:1,Midrash Tehillim 149,Yeshayahu 43:19,Meiri on Tehillim 149:1,Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael, Shirah 1,Siddur Sefard, weekday Shacharit,Tosafot on Pesachim 116bIt keeps saying "chasidim." I am not one. Is this psalm about someone else?
The word chasidim comes three times in nine verses: at the start, in the middle and at the end. Today it usually means members of the Chassidic movement, which began in the 1700s. The psalm is far older than that. So who does it mean?
The word comes from chesed, kindness or loyalty. In the Mishnah (the first written collection of the rabbis' laws), a chasid is the person who says: what is mine is yours, and what is yours is yours. Rambam (Maimonides, who died in 1204) defines a chasid as someone who is extra strict with himself and moves a little past the middle path, beyond what the law asks. That is a high bar.
Radak (Rabbi David Kimchi, Provence, around 1200) does not read the psalm that way. "The gathering of chasidim," he writes, "and they are Israel."
Midrash Tehillim (a collection of rabbinic teachings on Tehillim) asks the question outright: who are the chasidim? Its answer is the same, Israel, and it explains how. Whenever Israel sees God, they become chasidim. They saw Him at the sea, became chasidim, and sang. On this reading, chasid is something people become at a certain moment. It is not a fixed rank.
Meiri (Rabbi Menachem Meiri, Provence, around 1300) places it in the future. When the earth is full of the knowledge of God, he writes, the whole people will be called chasidim.
Malbim (a commentator on Tanach in the 1800s) reads the word more narrowly. For him the chasidim are the people closest to God, a group inside Israel. Even so, on verse 4 he writes that God is pleased with the people as a whole.
So the sources give two ways to hear the word: a name for the whole people, or a name for those closest to God. Radak and Malbim both read verse 4, "Hashem is pleased with His people," as being about the whole people.
Mishnah Avot 5:10,Rambam, Laws of Character Traits 1:5,Radak on Tehillim 149:1 and 149:4,Midrash Tehillim 149,Meiri on Tehillim 149:1,Malbim on Tehillim 149:1, 149:2 and 149:4