Fear God "in private"? Shouldn't it just say "always"?
You are not the first to ask. Almost 800 years ago, Shibbolei HaLeket reported that people were puzzled by the opening line, which in their prayer books read only "in private." They asked: in private, and not in the open? Because of that, the book says, Rashi had people skip the line and begin from "Master of all worlds."
The same book gives two answers. An authority it calls only "a Gaon" (the title of the heads of the great academies of Babylonia) wrote that the line belongs. It is pushing you to fear Heaven even in private, and to be truthful even in your heart. His example: you decided in your mind to put a coin in the charity box. You never said it out loud. Give it anyway.
The second answer is the one in the story card above: the line was first said to Jews who had to practice in secret.
Our siddur settles it by adding a word: "in private and in the open." Seder HaYom defends that wording. Someone might object that "in the open" is obvious, since the real test is where no one sees you. He answers that the line is not trying to teach something new. It describes how a person acts when the fear of Heaven is in front of him all the time, in both places. On the next words, about truth in the heart, he adds: when a person is the same inside as outside, he does not come to sin quickly.
Why is private the real test? The Gemara tells of Rabban Yochanan ben Zakkai, who led the Jewish people after the Second Temple was destroyed. When he was sick at the end of his life, his students asked for a blessing. He said: "May your fear of Heaven be like your fear of flesh and blood." They were surprised. That is all? He answered: if only it were that much. When a person does something wrong, he says, "I hope nobody sees me."
The opening line asks for the same person in both places.
Shibbolei HaLeket, section 6,Seder HaYom, Order of Morning Blessings,Berakhot 28bFirst it says we are nothing. Then it says God loves us. Which is it?
The prayer does swing hard. One paragraph: what are we, what is our strength, the mighty are like nothing. The next: but we are Your people, children of Avraham who loved You. Then: how fortunate we are.
Look at what each half is about. The first half is about what we can take credit for. It lists kindness, good deeds, strength and wisdom, and says none of it gives us a claim on God. The second half never says we are good after all. It says we belong to someone: a covenant, an oath on Mount Moriah, a name given out of love. Seder HaYom makes the turn right after saying the nations are like nothing: but in Your eyes we are not in that category. You loved us and wanted us.
The Torah makes the same two moves. Before the people enter the land, Moshe tells them it is "not because of your righteousness," and adds, "for you are a stiff-necked people." Then why? One reason he gives is the oath God swore to Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov. Elsewhere he says God did not choose them for their numbers, "for you are the fewest of all peoples," but out of love.
The Gemara goes a step further and connects the two halves. God says to Israel: I want you, because even when I give you greatness you make yourselves small. Avraham said, "I am dust and ashes." Moshe and Aharon said, "What are we?" The Hebrew word there is mah, the same word this prayer says over and over. The Gemara says the nations of the world are not like that, and names kings given power who said things like "Who is Hashem?" and "I sit in the seat of God."
So in these sources the answer is both, in that order. Small is about what you have earned. Loved is about whom you belong to.
Neilah on Yom Kippur makes the same turn. Right after "for everything is a breath" it says: "You set the human being apart from the beginning, and recognized him, to stand before You."
Devarim 9:5-6 and 7:7-8,Chullin 89a,Seder HaYom, Order of Morning Blessings,Neilah for Yom Kippur (Nusach Sefard machzor)"A human is no better than an animal." Does the siddur believe that?
The line is a quote. It comes from Kohelet (Ecclesiastes), and the Rambam's version of this prayer says so outright: "as it is written in Your holy words." In Kohelet the subject is death. People die and animals die: "as this one dies, so does that one." Rashi explains the verse this way: once a person has died, his advantage over an animal cannot be seen, because everything goes back to dust.
Kohelet says many things like this. The Gemara reports that the Sages considered putting the book away, because its statements contradict one another. They kept it because of how it begins and how it ends: "The end of the matter, when all is heard: fear God and keep His commandments, for this is the whole person."
Two verses after our line, Kohelet asks: "Who knows if the human spirit goes upward, and the spirit of the animal goes down to the earth?" Rashi does not read that as doubt. He reads it as: who understands and takes to heart that the human spirit rises and stands in judgment, while the animal's goes down and never has to give an accounting? So, he says, a person must not behave like an animal, which does not care what it does.
Our text of the prayer says the same thing in its own words. Right after "for everything is a breath" we add: "Except for the pure soul, which will one day give a full accounting before Your throne of glory." The midrash this prayer comes from and the Rambam's text go straight from the verse to "But we are Your people." So does Nusach Ashkenaz. Seder HaYom explains our version: in the body and its appetites, a person has no advantage over an animal. Whatever extra we have comes from the soul.
So the siddur's answer is no, with a condition. What makes you more than an animal is the same thing that makes you answerable. An animal is never asked to explain itself. You are.
Kohelet 3:19-21 with Rashi,Shabbat 30b,Rambam, Order of Prayer,Seder HaYom, Order of Morning Blessings