Can God be happy? What would that even mean?
The first line asks for something strange: "May Hashem be happy with what He made." People are happy when things go their way. What could fail to go God's way?
The Gemara (the rabbis' discussions built on the Mishnah) ties the line to a moment in creation. The grasses kept their kinds apart without being told to, and an angel said this verse (the Story section has it). Rashi (the classic commentator, France, died 1105) explains what the angel meant: God is happy with His works because all of them are careful about what He commands.
A Midrash (Vayikra Rabbah, a collection of rabbinic teachings on Vayikra) looks at the tense. The verse does not say "Hashem was happy with what He made." It says "will be happy." God, "so to speak," has not been happy in His world. He will be, in the future, with what the righteous do.
The Radak (Rabbi David Kimchi, Provence, around 1200) gives two readings. In the first, the verse belongs to the end of creation: everything is God's work and His glory, and He is happy with it. In the second, it is about the future. In this world, he writes, there are times of sadness, like the generation of the Flood, where the Torah says God "was saddened in His heart." When people do what God wants, then He is happy.
Then the Radak adds a warning. Happiness and sadness, said about God, are a figure of speech. "He has no happiness and no sadness, and He does not change from one state to another." A person is happy when his work turns out well and sad when it does not, and the verse borrows those words so that listeners understand. The Ribono Shel Olam prayer asks the same question about God's anger.
Put the sources side by side. For the Radak, "happy" is a way of saying that God's work turned out as He wanted. For the Midrash, that has not fully happened yet, and it waits on what people do. That makes the line a wish, not a report.
Tehillim 104:31,Chullin 60a, with Rashi,Vayikra Rabbah 20:2,Radak on Tehillim 104:31,Bereishit 6:6If God's plan always wins, why bother making plans?
One line here comes from Mishlei (Proverbs), King Shlomo's book of sayings: "Many are the thoughts in a person's heart, but the plan of Hashem is what will stand." It can sound like a reason to stop trying.
Midrash Mishlei (rabbinic teachings on Mishlei) asks who Shlomo had in mind, and gives a list. Avshalom, who thought he would kill his father David and take the throne. Adoniyahu, who decided he was the one fit to be king. Haman. Pharaoh, who ordered every baby boy thrown into the river. None of them, it says, knew that God's plan came before his. On this reading the "many thoughts" are schemes, and the verse says they fail.
The Ramban (Nachmanides, Spain, 1200s) applies the verse to someone who was not scheming at all. Yaakov sent Yosef to check on his brothers. Yosef got lost in a field. A stranger found him and pointed the way, and that led to the pit and to Egypt. Why does the Torah bother with the stranger? To teach, the Ramban says, that "the decree is true and the effort is false." God sent Yosef a guide without his knowing it, "to tell us that the plan of Hashem is what will stand."
In the same comment the Ramban praises Yosef for not giving up. He had many reasons to turn back, and he put up with all of it for his father's honor.
The Malbim (a commentator of the 1800s) says it as a rule. The "thoughts" are all the ways a person weighs to reach a goal, and choosing between them is up to him. But "although the choice is in a person's hand, how the act ends is under God's supervision."
In the Gemara, Rabba reads the verse another way. He means Torah learned for its own sake: a plan that has God's word in it will stand forever. None of these sources says not to plan. For the Malbim, the choosing is yours and the ending is not. Later Yosef told his brothers: "You planned evil against me. God planned it for good."
Mishlei 19:21,Midrash Mishlei 19,Ramban on Bereishit 37:15,Malbim on Mishlei 19:21,Sanhedrin 26b,Bereishit 50:20"Nations have perished from His land." Is this prayer against non-Jews?
Four of the eighteen lines mention the nations. Two are hard: "Hashem is King forever and ever; nations have perished from His land," and "Hashem cancels the plan of nations."
The first is from Tehillim 10. It describes a wicked person who hides to grab the poor and kill the innocent, and tells himself, "God has forgotten... He never sees." The psalm asks God to break his arm. Then our line. Then the ending: justice for the orphan and the crushed, so that no one on earth terrorizes people anymore.
Rashi (the classic commentator, France, died 1105) adds no limit: God is King forever once the nations are gone from His land. Others say which nations. The Radak (Rabbi David Kimchi, Provence, around 1200): "the wicked who oppress Israel in exile." Metzudat David (a commentary from the 1700s): they were lost "because of their evil deeds." The Meiri (Rabbi Menachem Meiri, Provence, around 1300): "the nations who deny His faith." None of them softens the word "perished."
The second line is from Tehillim 33. The Radak: even if all the nations agreed on one plan, God would cancel it. Ibn Ezra (Rabbi Avraham ibn Ezra, Spain, 1100s): no nation can cancel God's plan, but He cancels theirs.
Other lines sound different. "From the rising of the sun to its setting, the name of Hashem is praised." The Radak: all people, from east to west. Some worship the stars, and still all admit He is the highest cause. On "high above all nations": all the nations lift Him up.
One more source, about a different verse. Tehillim 104, the source of this prayer's first line, ends: "Let sinners vanish from the earth." The Gemara tells of thugs who tormented Rabbi Meir (a sage of the Mishnah) until he prayed for them to die. His wife Beruriah said: is the word "sinners"? It is written "sins." Pray that they change. He did, and they did.
So the prayer does take sides. The commentators say against whom: oppressors, evildoers, those who deny God. It also pictures "Hashem reigns" being said among the nations.
Tehillim 10,Rashi, Radak, Metzudat David and Meiri on Tehillim 10:16,Radak and Ibn Ezra on Tehillim 33:10,Radak on Tehillim 113:3-4,Divrei HaYamim I 16:31,Tehillim 104:35,Berakhot 10a