People call this the most powerful prayer there is. Is it a magic formula?
You may have heard Ana BeKoach described as a kind of code: say these 42 words and things happen. The Gemara does speak of a Name of God with 42 letters, and later teachers find it in the first letters of this prayer. So what is a Name like that for?
The Gemara gives no instructions for use. It gives a list of who may be taught it: someone modest and humble, halfway through life, who does not get angry, does not get drunk, and does not insist on his due. Rashi (France, 1000s) explains the last one. A person who holds a grudge might use the Name to take revenge. So for Rashi the Name is strong, and that is why it is kept from the wrong hands.
The Rambam (Maimonides, who died in 1204) reads the same Gemara and lands somewhere else. In his Guide for the Perplexed he writes that 42 letters cannot be one word. The Name was a group of words that taught something true about God. What was handed down was the meaning, not just the sounds. That, he says, is why the Gemara asks for so much character first.
He goes further. Foolish people, he writes, took this Gemara as an opening to string letters together and claim the result is a Name that acts when it is written or said. He calls those claims lies, and quotes Mishlei: "A simple person believes anything."
The teachers of Kabbalah did hold that this Name does something. The book Reishit Chochmah (by Rabbi Eliyahu de Vidas, Tzfat, 1500s) quotes the Tikkunim, a companion to the Zohar (the central book of Kabbalah): this Name lifts the soul upward at night and hides it from forces that would harm it. So the sources do not agree.
But the Gemara they all start from puts character first: who you are, before what you say.
Now read the words you are actually saying. Please. Accept. Purify us. Guard them. Hear our cry. Every line asks. A formula makes something happen. A request leaves the answer to God.
Kiddushin 71a, with Rashi,Rambam, Guide for the Perplexed 1:62,Mishlei 14:15,Reishit Chochmah, Gate of Holiness, chapter 7, quoting the TikkunimIf this Name was a secret for a chosen few, why is it in every siddur?
The Gemara treats God's longer Names as restricted. A twelve-letter Name was once taught to anyone. When too many people misused it, it was handed only to the discreet ones among the kohanim (the priests), and they would swallow it inside the singing of the other kohanim. Rabbi Tarfon says he once leaned toward the Kohen Gadol (the High Priest) and caught him doing it. The 42-letter Name was kept for people who fit a list: modest, humble, mature, calm, sober, forgiving.
By Rashi's time, about a thousand years ago, Rashi himself writes of the twelve-letter and the 42-letter Names: "They did not explain them to us." So how did a guarded Name end up in a prayer that whole congregations sing on Friday night?
Part of the answer is that you never say the Name. You say 42 ordinary Hebrew words: please, strength, greatness, Your right hand. The Name is there only in their first letters, and nobody reads first letters aloud.
The students of the Arizal (Rabbi Yitzchak Luria, the Kabbalah teacher of Tzfat, who died in 1572) say so. Pri Etz Chaim, a record of his teachings, says in its instructions for bedtime: be careful not to say the 42-letter Name, except through Ana BeKoach, "by way of prayer, and not with the actual letters." The Ben Ish Chai (Rabbi Yosef Chaim of Baghdad, who died in 1909) says to have the first letters in mind as holy Names while you say the words. That is thinking, not saying.
So the Name stays unspoken. That does not settle everything. The Gemara's rule is about who may be taught the Name, and Siddur Sefard prints its letters next to each line on Friday night. We did not find a source that explains how that fits the Gemara.
There is an echo here, though no source we found points it out. In the Gemara, the kohanim hid a Name inside a melody. Here a Name is carried inside the words of a prayer.
Kiddushin 71a, with Rashi,Pri Etz Chaim, Gate of the Bedtime Shema, chapter 2,Ben Ish Chai, Year 1, Miketz 9I am not tied up and I am not crying. So whose prayer is this?
Line one asks God to untie someone who is bound. Line seven asks Him to hear "our outcry." The prayer never says who is tied up, or why.
Who is talking? Not one person. The lines say "Your people," "Your community," "us." Rav Kook (the first Chief Rabbi of the Land of Israel, who died in 1935), in Olat Re'iyah, his commentary on the siddur, says of line two: "we pray for ourselves and for all Israel."
The words have been used before. In Shemot, the slaves in Egypt groan from their work, "and their cry for help rose up to God." God tells Moshe: "I have heard their outcry... for I know their pain." Cry for help, outcry, hear, know: all four are in line seven. No source we opened makes this link. It is ours, and Tanach uses these words elsewhere too. If it holds, line seven sounds like slaves waiting to get out.
So who is tied up? The teachers we opened differ. Rav Kook does not point to a person. Even God's kindness, he writes, reaches us tied to this world's limits. When the bound is untied, "everything will be in complete freedom." Ohev Yisrael (by Rabbi Avraham Yehoshua Heschel of Apta, a Chassidic rebbe) suggests, with a "perhaps," that what is tied is the "bundle of life," a phrase from the book of Shmuel. We ask God to untie it, open it and let it flow to the community of Israel. The Sparks section has a third reading.
Why right after the Temple readings? The Story section gives Kabbalah's reason. Rav Kook ties the prayer to them another way. He takes it as written by Rabbi Nechunya ben HaKanah (named in the heading), who prays, he says, to raise up everything that has sunk low. It comes, he writes, to help us feel what the Temple service reaches for: the offerings we remember today, the Temple that stood and will stand, and their tie to prayer. Prayer, he adds, tries to uncover holiness "wrapped in everyday clothes," in "the yoke of human life and its many tangles."
Shemot 2:23 and 3:7,Rav Kook, Olat Re'iyah, on Ana BeKoach,Ohev Yisrael, Parashat Masei,Shmuel I 25:29