Siddur › Shacharit › Korbanot

TT Siddur · Shacharit

רִבּוֹן הָעוֹלָמִים

Ribon HaOlamim

Asks that our words count as the daily offering. Five verses added on Rosh Chodesh.

Draft. This siddur is waiting for a rav's review. For a halachic question, ask your rav.

At a glance

When
In the morning, after the Temple readings
Oldest source we found
The Tur, a law code from the 1300s
Key verse
Hoshea 14:3, first said while a Temple stood
On Rosh Chodesh
Five more verses: Bamidbar 28:11-15

The words

Hebrew, then English. Open "What it means" under any line for the explanation.

  1. After the readings about the Temple service:

    רִבּוֹן הָעוֹלָמִים אַתָּה צִוִּיתָנוּ לְהַקְרִיב קָרְבַּן הַתָּמִיד בְּמוֹעֲדוֹ וְלִהְיוֹת כֹּהֲנִים בַּעֲבוֹדָתָם וּלְוִיִּם בְּדוּכָנָם וְיִשְׂרָאֵל בְּמַעֲמָדָם,

    Master of the worlds, You commanded us to bring the daily offering at its set time, with kohanim at their service, Levites on their platform, and Israelites at their post.

    What it means

    Master of the worlds, You commanded us to bring the daily offering at its set time, with kohanim (priests) at their service, Levites on their platform, and Israelites at their post.

    This three-part phrase comes straight from the Gemara (the rabbis' discussions built on the Mishnah). So does a ruling of the sage Shmuel: kohanim, Levites and Israelites all "hold back the offering." It could not go ahead unless all three were there. The Tamid passage told how ordinary Israelites took turns standing by it.

    Megillah 3a; Taanit 27a
  2. וְעַתָּה בַּעֲוֹנוֹתֵינוּ חָרַב בֵּית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ וּבֻטַּל הַתָּמִיד וְאֵין לָנוּ לֹא כֹהֵן בַּעֲבוֹדָתוֹ וְלֹא לֵוִי בְּדוּכָנוֹ וְלֹא יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּמַעֲמָדוֹ.

    And now, because of our sins, the Temple has been destroyed and the daily offering has stopped. We have no kohen at his service, no Levite on his platform, and no Israelite at his post.

    What it means

    The two verbs in this line belong to the two summer fasts. The Mishnah (the first written collection of the Sages' rulings, about 200 CE) lists what happened on each. On the 17th of Tammuz, "the daily offering stopped." On the 9th of Av, "the House was destroyed, the first time and the second." This line puts the two together.

    Mishnah Taanit 4:6
  3. לָכֵן יְהִי רָצוֹן מִלְּפָנֶיךָ יְיָ אֱלֹהֵינוּ וֵאלֹהֵי אֲבוֹתֵינוּ שֶׁיְּהֵא שִׂיחַ שִׂפְתוֹתֵינוּ חָשׁוּב וּמְקֻבָּל וּמְרֻצֶּה לְפָנֶיךָ כְּאִלּוּ הִקְרַבְנוּ קָרְבַּן הַתָּמִיד בְּמוֹעֲדוֹ וְעָמַדְנוּ עַל מַעֲמָדוֹ.

    Therefore, may it be Your will, Hashem, our God and God of our ancestors, that the talk of our lips be counted, accepted and welcome before You as if we had brought the daily offering at its set time and stood at its post.

    What it means

    How old is this request? The Tur (a code of Jewish law, Spain, 1300s) already has it. He writes that "it is good to say" it after the list of the Temple's daily service, and gives the words. His version is shorter, and its last words are in the singular: "as if the daily offering was brought at its time and I stood at its post."

    Tur, Orach Chaim 48
  4. Hoshea 14:3:

    כְּמָה שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר וּנְשַׁלְּמָה פָרִים שְׂפָתֵינוּ.

    As it is said: We will pay with our lips in place of bulls.

    What it means

    Hoshea (a prophet of the 700s BCE) tells the people: "Take words with you and return to Hashem." Then he gives them the words. This line is one of them. Radak (Rabbi David Kimchi, Provence, about 1200) explains: I am not asking you for silver and gold or burnt offerings. Only good words that admit your sins. And return with all your heart, not lips alone.

    Hoshea 14:3, with Radak
  5. Vayikra 1:11:

    וְנֶאֶמַר וְשָׁחַט אֹתוֹ עַל יֶרֶךְ הַמִּזְבֵּחַ צָפֹנָה לִפְנֵי יְיָ וְזָרְקוּ בְּנֵי אַהֲרֹן הַכֹּהֲנִים אֶת דָּמוֹ עַל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ סָבִיב.

    And it is said: He shall slaughter it at the side of the altar, to the north, before Hashem, and Aharon's sons, the kohanim, shall throw its blood against the altar, all around.

    What it means

    And it is said: "He shall slaughter it at the north side of the altar, before Hashem, and Aharon's sons, the kohanim, shall throw its blood against the altar, all around."

    The Tamid passage explained why this verse is said. Here is where it leads. After this prayer the siddur goes on to a chapter of Mishnah about where each offering was slaughtered. Its line on the burnt offering is this verse turned into law: slaughtered in the north, its blood caught in the north, and thrown twice so that it reaches all four sides.

    Mishnah Zevachim 5:4
  6. Vayikra 7:37:

    וְנֶאֱמַר זֹאת הַתּוֹרָה לָעֹלָה לַמִּנְחָה וְלַחַטָּאת וְלָאָשָׁם וְלַמִּלּוּאִים וּלְזֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים.

    And it is said: This is the teaching for the burnt offering, the grain offering, the sin offering and the guilt offering, the installation offering and the peace offerings.

    What it means

    And it is said: "This is the teaching for the burnt offering, for the grain offering, for the sin offering and the guilt offering, for the installation offering and for the sacrifice of the peace offerings."

    Why end with this verse? Reish Lakish (a sage in the Land of Israel) reads it in the Gemara this way: whoever is busy with Torah is counted as if he brought a burnt offering, a grain offering, a sin offering and a guilt offering. Rava (a leading sage in Babylonia) presses on the verse's wording and goes further: such a person does not need them.

    Menachot 110a
  7. On Rosh Chodesh, add these verses (Bamidbar 28:11-15):

    וּבְרָאשֵׁי חָדְשֵׁיכֶם תַּקְרִיבוּ עֹלָה לַייָ פָּרִים בְּנֵי בָקָר שְׁנַיִם וְאַיִל אֶחָד כְּבָשִׂים בְּנֵי שָׁנָה שִׁבְעָה תְּמִימִם.

    And at the start of your months you shall bring a burnt offering to Hashem: two young bulls, one ram, and seven lambs in their first year, without a blemish.

    What it means

    And at the start of each of your months you shall bring a burnt offering to Hashem: two young bulls, one ram, and seven lambs in their first year, without a blemish.

    Should these verses be said here at all? The Shulchan Aruch (the main code of Jewish law) says no: on Rosh Chodesh these same verses are read from the Torah scroll. The Rema (Rabbi Moshe Isserles, whose notes on it give Ashkenazi practice) records that the custom is to say them anyway, "to make it known that it is Rosh Chodesh."

    Shulchan Aruch and Rema, Orach Chaim 48:1
  8. וּשְׁלשָׁה עֶשְׂרֹנִים סֹלֶת מִנְחָה בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לַפָּר הָאֶחָד וּשְׁנֵי עֶשְׂרֹנִים סֹלֶת מִנְחָה בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לָאַיִל הָאֶחָד.

    And three tenths of fine flour, a grain offering mixed with oil, for each bull, and two tenths of fine flour, a grain offering mixed with oil, for the one ram.

    What it means

    And three tenths of an ephah of fine flour, a grain offering mixed with oil, for each bull, and two tenths of fine flour, a grain offering mixed with oil, for the one ram.

    Why three tenths for a bull and two for a ram? Rashi says this is the standard rate. Bamidbar 15 sets the flour, oil and wine that go with any lamb, ram or bull, and the bigger the animal, the more comes with it. A "tenth" is the tenth of an ephah from the Tamid passage: the size of one person's daily portion of manna.

    Rashi on Bamidbar 28:12; Bamidbar 15:4-9; Shemot 16:16 and 16:36
  9. וְעִשָּׂרֹן עִשָּׂרוֹן סֹלֶת מִנְחָה בְּלוּלָה בַשֶּׁמֶן לַכֶּבֶשׂ הָאֶחָד עֹלָה רֵיחַ נִיחֹחַ אִשֶּׁה לַייָ.

    And one tenth each of fine flour, a grain offering mixed with oil, for each lamb: a burnt offering, a pleasing scent, a fire offering to Hashem.

    What it means

    "A pleasing scent, a fire offering." The Mishnah notices that the Torah uses these words for a burnt offering of an animal, for one of a bird, and for a grain offering of flour. Its conclusion: "One who gives much and one who gives little are the same, as long as a person directs his mind to Heaven."

    Mishnah Menachot 13:11
  10. וְנִסְכֵּיהֶם חֲצִי הַהִין יִהְיֶה לַפָּר וּשְׁלִישִׁת הַהִין לָאַיִל וּרְבִיעִת הַהִין לַכֶּבֶשׂ יָיִן זֹאת עֹלַת חֹדֶשׁ בְּחָדְשׁוֹ לְחָדְשֵׁי הַשָּׁנָה.

    Their drink offerings: half a hin for a bull, a third of a hin for the ram, and a quarter of a hin for a lamb, of wine. This is the burnt offering of each month in its month, for the months of the year.

    What it means

    Their drink offerings shall be half a hin of wine for a bull, a third of a hin for the ram, and a quarter of a hin for a lamb. This is the burnt offering of each month in its own month, for the months of the year.

    Half, a third, a quarter. The Mishnah lists a half-hin, a third-hin and a quarter-hin among the seven liquid measures kept in the Temple. Rabbi Eliezer bar Tzadok pictures it differently: one measure, a hin, with marks on it. "Up to here for a bull, up to here for a ram, up to here for a lamb."

    Mishnah Menachot 9:2, with Bartenura
  11. וּשְׂעִיר עִזִּים אֶחָד לְחַטָּאת לַייָ עַל עֹלַת הַתָּמִיד יֵעָשֶׂה וְנִסְכּוֹ.

    And one he-goat as a sin offering to Hashem. In addition to the daily burnt offering it shall be offered, and its drink offering.

    What it means

    And one he-goat as a sin offering to Hashem. It shall be offered in addition to the daily burnt offering and its drink offering.

    The extra offerings of every festival include a goat. Only this one is called a sin offering "to Hashem." Rashi gives the legal reading first: it atones for impurity in the Temple that no person ever knew about. Only God knew. Then he quotes a teaching of the Sages. God says: "Bring an atonement for Me, because I made the moon smaller."

    Rashi on Bamidbar 28:15; Chullin 60b

The story

No bull? Bring words.

The Midrash Tanchuma (an early collection of rabbinic teachings on the Torah) has God set a sliding scale. Whoever has a bull brings a bull. Whoever has a ram brings a ram. Then a lamb, then a dove. Whoever has none of these brings flour. And whoever has no flour, and nothing at all, brings words, as the prophet Hoshea said: "Take words with you and return to Hashem." Will words be accepted? God answers yes, with the line this prayer quotes: "We will pay with our lips in place of bulls."

Midrash Tanchuma, Tzav 6; Hoshea 14:3

Hoshea said it with a Temple standing

The key verse does not come from after the destruction. Hoshea was a prophet in the days of four kings of Yehudah, when the First Temple stood and bulls were being offered. Radak (Rabbi David Kimchi, Provence, about 1200) explains his words: in place of bulls we will pay You the confession of our lips, because You want words of repentance more. Offerings, he writes, do no good without admitting the wrong. So the idea of paying with our lips is older than the destruction.

Hoshea 1:1 and 14:3; Radak on Hoshea 14:3

A prayer with the same shape in the Gemara

The Gemara (the rabbis' discussions built on the Mishnah) records what Rav Sheshet, a sage in Babylonia about 1,700 years ago, said after praying on a fast day: "Master of the worlds, You know that when the Temple stood, a person who sinned brought an offering. Only its fat and blood were offered, and it atoned for him. Now I have fasted, and my own fat and blood have grown less. May it be Your will that this count as if I had offered it on the altar." Same opening words. Same then and now. Same "as if."

Berakhot 17a

Who wrote it?

Nobody knows. The oldest source we found is the Tur, a code of Jewish law from Spain in the 1300s. It calls it "good to say" after Abaye's order, two passages back. Its shorter version argues from Hoshea, "and You said: we will pay with our lips in place of bulls," and ends in the singular: "as if the daily offering was brought at its time, and I stood at its post." Siddur Sefard says "we" and adds two verses from Vayikra. The Rema (Rabbi Moshe Isserles, Poland, 1500s) lists it as something "some say."

Tur, Orach Chaim 48; Rema, Orach Chaim 48:1

A phrase the Gemara already used

"Kohanim (priests) at their service, Levites on their platform, Israelites at their post" is a set phrase in the Gemara. In one place, all three stop what they are doing to go hear the Megillah on Purim. In another, when they finished and left, they did not turn their backs. They walked off with their faces turned to the side. From there the Gemara moves to a student leaving a teacher, and then to the three steps back that end the Amidah (the standing prayer). The Tamid passage explains the Israelites' post.

Megillah 3a; Yoma 53a-53b

Kids on the choir floor

The platform is where the Levites stood to sing as the wine of the daily offering was poured. The Mishnah (the Sages' collected rulings, about 200 CE) says at least twelve stood on it. Young Levites came in to sing along, voices only, "to add spice to the melody." One sage says the boys stood on the ground, heads between the Levites' legs. What did they sing? A psalm for each day of the week. It is still in your siddur near the end of Shacharit, as what "the Levites used to say in the Temple."

Mishnah Arakhin 2:6, with Bartenura; Mishnah Tamid 7:3-4

Why five more verses on Rosh Chodesh?

On Rosh Chodesh (the first day of a Hebrew month) the Temple brought extra offerings on top of the two daily lambs: two bulls, a ram, seven lambs and a goat. These five verses list them. The Tur reports that communities in Germany read them here on Rosh Chodesh. Not everyone agreed. The Shulchan Aruch (the main code of Jewish law) rules not to add them, since they are read from the Torah that morning. The Rema records that the custom is to say them, and why: "to make it known that it is Rosh Chodesh."

Bamidbar 28:11-15; Tur, Orach Chaim 48; Shulchan Aruch and Rema, Orach Chaim 48:1

Hard questions

The Temple fell "because of our sins." I was not there. Why "our"?

The prayer could have said "their sins." It says "our sins." Musaf, the additional prayer of the festivals, does the same: "Because of our sins we were exiled from our land." The Second Temple fell more than 1,900 years ago. So what does "our" mean?

Start with what the sins were. The Gemara (the rabbis' discussions built on the Mishnah) says the First Temple was destroyed for three things: idol worship, forbidden sexual relations and bloodshed. The Second Temple is the surprise. The Gemara says the people of that time were busy with Torah, mitzvot and acts of kindness. It fell because there was hatred for no reason. The Gemara's lesson: hatred for no reason weighs as much as the other three together.

The Talmud Yerushalmi (the Gemara of the Land of Israel) tells it almost the same way, and adds that they loved money. Then it gives a line that speaks to this question: "Every generation in whose days it is not rebuilt is counted as if it destroyed it."

The Yerushalmi does not say why. The Yalkut Shimoni (a medieval collection of midrash) quotes the line and adds a reason: "because it did not repent."

So "our" is not a claim that you were there. One way to read these sources: what brought the Temple down has not yet been repaired, and the repair is the job of every generation, including this one. That is a heavy thing to say each morning, and the sources do not soften it. The sin they name for the Second Temple is about how people treat each other.

Yoma 9b,Talmud Yerushalmi, Yoma 1:1,Yalkut Shimoni on Tehillim, section 886,Siddur Sefard, Musaf for the festivals

Is saying the words as good as the real offering, or is it second best?

The Kiyor passage, earlier in the siddur, already asks why we read about offerings at all. This is a different question. Does the reading fully count, or is it a stand-in until the real thing comes back?

The prayer itself sounds like loss. It lists what is gone: no kohen (priest) at his service, no Levite on his platform, no Israelite at his post. And it asks only that our words count "as if" we had brought the offering.

Now listen to Rabbi Elazar in the Gemara: "Prayer is greater than offerings." A few lines later the same Rabbi Elazar says: "From the day the Temple was destroyed, the gates of prayer have been locked." The gates of tears, he adds, were not locked. Both statements are his, on the same page.

The verse that closes this prayer begins: "This is the teaching of the burnt offering, the grain offering, the sin offering and the guilt offering." The Gemara gives those words two readings. Reish Lakish: whoever is busy with Torah is counted as if he brought all four. Rava goes further: whoever is busy with Torah does not need them.

A midrash in Shemot Rabbah (a collection of rabbinic teachings on Shemot) pictures a conversation. Israel says: we are poor, and we have no offerings to bring. God answers: I am asking for words, meaning words of Torah. They say: we do not know any. God says: cry and pray before Me, and I will accept it.

On the other side, the Rambam (Maimonides, who died in 1204) writes in his code of law that the Mashiach (the Messiah) will rebuild the Temple, and offerings will be brought again. The request before the daily offering verses asks for the same thing.

So the sources hold both. Words count, maybe more than we assume. And something is missing that words do not replace. This prayer says both at once.

Berakhot 32b,Menachot 110a,Shemot Rabbah 38:4,Rambam, Laws of Kings 11:1

A goat as a sin offering "to Hashem"? Since when does God need one?

Look at the last verse added on Rosh Chodesh (the first day of a Hebrew month): one goat "as a sin offering to Hashem." The festivals have a goat like it. Only here does the Torah add "to Hashem." The Gemara noticed.

It tells a story. The Torah calls the sun and the moon "the two great lights," and then, in the same verse, the great one and the small one. The moon said to God: can two kings share one crown? God said: go and make yourself smaller. The moon protested: I said something right, and I should shrink? God offered one comfort after another. The moon was not comforted. So God said: "Bring an atonement for Me, because I made the moon smaller." Reish Lakish says that is the goat of Rosh Chodesh.

Rashi (the classic Torah commentator, France, died 1105) gives a legal reading first. This goat atones for impurity brought into the Temple that no person ever found out about. Only God knows of that sin. Then he brings the moon story as a midrash.

Rabbeinu Bachya (Spain, about 1300) collects more. He quotes the Rif (Rabbi Yitzchak Alfasi, 1000s) that the Hebrew word for "for Me" is to be read like "to Me," and says most commentators read it that way. As he explains the story, God gave the moon the honor of this offering to make peace with her, to show that God does not want one of His creatures accusing another.

The Rambam, in the Guide for the Perplexed (his book of philosophy), reads the words with no story at all. The Egyptians of old brought offerings to the moon at each new moon. The Torah says "to Hashem" so that no one thinks this goat is for the moon.

Ibn Ezra (a Spanish-born Bible commentator of the 1100s) notes that the grammar points the opposite way from the midrash, and says only: "it has a secret." Rabbeinu Bachya also calls it one of the hidden matters of the Torah. The commentators do not settle on one meaning.

Bamidbar 28:15, with Rashi, Ibn Ezra and Rabbeinu Bachya,Chullin 60b,Bereishit 1:16,Rambam, Guide for the Perplexed 3:46 (Ibn Tibbon's Hebrew)

Sparks

Short ideas from the Chassidic masters, the Kabbalah and the Mussar teachers.

Zohar

Brain, heart, body

Three groups stand in this prayer: kohanim, Levites and Israelites. The Zohar (the central book of Kabbalah) says they are like one person. The kohen is the brain. The Levite is the heart. Israel is the body. One line earlier, the Zohar says what God takes from an offering: only the wanting of the heart, and its being broken. It quotes Tehillim: "The offerings of God are a broken spirit." Now read the request in this prayer again.

כַּהֲנָא מוֹחָא. לֵוִי לִבָּא. גּוּפָא יִשְׂרָאֵל. וְאִתְּמַר בְּהוֹן, כֹּהֲנִים בַּעֲבוֹדָתָם, וּלְוִּיִם בְּדוּכָנָם, וְיִשְׂרָאֵל בְּמַעֲמָדָם.

Zohar, Parashat Pinchas
Rav Kook

What holds a Temple up

"Because of our sins the Temple was destroyed." Rav Kook (the first Chief Rabbi of the Land of Israel, who died in 1935) explains these words by describing what keeps a Temple standing. Souls that are pure. An inner life in the nation that keeps rising. A steady longing for justice, honesty, truth, holiness and a pure life. When those hold, he writes, the Temple stands in its place. When life grows thin and the holy light in it dims, that light cannot shine out in the open either.

כשהשקיקה לצדק, ליושר, לאמת, לקדושה עליונה, ולטהרת החיים, היא קבועה, אז הקדש הכללי עומד במכונו, בית המקדש על משפטו

Rav Kook, Olat Re'iyah, on Ribon HaOlamim
Chassidut

The gift that lasted

A midrash says Moshe was sad. Everyone had given something to build the Mishkan, the desert sanctuary, and he had not. God told him: your speech is dearer to Me than all of it. The Sefat Emet (Rabbi Yehudah Aryeh Leib Alter of Ger, a Chassidic leader who died in 1905) explains why Moshe minded. Whatever Moshe gave us stayed for all generations. Had he had a share in the Mishkan and the offerings, they would have stayed too. God's answer: your power stays in speech. That, he says, is this verse: our lips will pay.

ואם הי' למשה רבינו ע"ה חלק בעשיות המשכן וקרבנות הי' ג"כ נשאר לדורות. ולכן עגמה נפשו. והקב"ה השיב כי כלי יקר שפתי דעת שנשאר כוחו בדיבור. כמ"ש ונשלמה פרים שפתינו

Sefat Emet, Parashat Vayikra, 5658 (1898); Vayikra Rabbah 1:6
Chassidut

Not out of pain

Rabbi Kalonymus Kalman Shapira (the Rebbe of Piaseczno in Poland, killed in the Holocaust in 1943) wrote about this verse in German-occupied Warsaw, for the Shabbat before Yom Kippur 1940. With no animal offerings, he says, the prayer and Torah a person puts his soul into are the offering itself. Even a Jew who cries to God only because he hurts: that too is like an offering. But in Hoshea, two words come right before ours: "take good." He asks: why should the offerings of our lips come from pain? Let them come out of good things, and song.

למה נביא קרבנות ונשלמה פרים שפתינו מכאב ויסורים ח״ו, וקח טוב ונשלמה וכו׳ תפילות מתוך טובות וישועות טובות ושירה וזמרה

Esh Kodesh, Shabbat Shuvah 5701 (1940)
Chassidut

Light for someone still in the dark

The Gemara asks why the Rosh Chodesh goat is the one called an offering "for Hashem." Its answer: God says, bring an atonement for Me, for making the moon smaller. Rabbi Kalonymus Kalman Shapira of Piaseczno, in a sermon from 1930, explains what the smaller light is for. The moon, he says, does not cancel the night. It brings a little light into it. It is sunlight cut down for someone who is still in the dark. So whenever you want to start over, he says, start like the new moon: with a small light that reaches the place where you are.

הירח שמאירה אינה מבטלת את הלילה וחשכותו רק גם ללילה ממשכת מעט אור

Derekh HaMelekh, Parashat HaChodesh 5690 (1930); Chullin 60b

Halacha

The practical laws. For a final ruling, ask your rav.

Do I have to say this?

The Tur (a law code from the 1300s) writes that "it is good to say" this after the order of the altar service. If you cannot because you are praying with the congregation, he advises reading the daily offering passage on your own first and saying this after. The Rema (Rabbi Moshe Isserles, who added Ashkenazi practice to the Shulchan Aruch, the main code of Jewish law) writes that "some say" it. Peninei Halakhah (a modern law guide): the prayers printed with the offerings are good to say, but not an obligation.

Tur, Orach Chaim 48; Rema, Orach Chaim 48:1; Peninei Halakhah, Prayer 13:1

Is it said on Shabbat and Yom Tov?

Customs differ. The Shabbat Siddur Sefard notes that some do not say this on Shabbat and Yom Tov. The Chabad siddur drops it on any day without Tachanun, the pleading prayer after the Amidah. That includes Rosh Chodesh. The Sefard Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur prayer books print it with no note. None gives a reason, and we found no source that does. A rule from the Ribono Shel Olam card may be behind it: Shabbat leaves out pleading that breaks the heart. This prayer says the Temple was destroyed for our sins.

Shabbat Siddur Sefard; Chabad siddur; Machzor Rosh Hashanah Sefard; Machzor Yom Kippur Sefard

My friend's siddur has no Rosh Chodesh verses here. Why?

The Shulchan Aruch adds extra-offering verses here on Shabbat only. Rosh Chodesh and Yom Tov get none, because their verses are read from the Torah that morning. The Shabbat offering has just two verses, too few for a Torah reading, explains the Mishnah Berurah (a major commentary on daily Jewish law, about 1900). The Rema: some add Rosh Chodesh too, "and that is the custom, to make it known that it is Rosh Chodesh." This siddur prints them. Siddur Edot HaMizrach (Sephardic) and the Chabad siddur have none here.

Shulchan Aruch and Rema, Orach Chaim 48:1 and 421:1; Mishnah Berurah 48:6; Siddur Edot HaMizrach; Chabad siddur

Why would Rosh Chodesh need advertising?

Because it is easy to miss. The Mishnah Berurah: a Yom Tov is already known from the day before. The Aruch HaShulchan (a law code from around 1900): Rosh Chodesh does not stand out, and people can forget Ya'aleh VeYavo, the paragraph it adds to the Amidah. The Magen Avraham (a 1600s commentary on the Shulchan Aruch) points to the Temple. The Mishnah (the core text of the Oral Torah) says the parts of the Rosh Chodesh offering got a place of their own by the altar. The Gemara: to show the new month was set on time.

Mishnah Berurah 48:6; Aruch HaShulchan, Orach Chaim 421:1; Magen Avraham 48:3; Mishnah Shekalim 8:8; Sukkah 54b-55a

Musaf is hours away. Isn't this out of order?

Sefer HaManhig (a book of customs from about 1200) objected: how can extra offerings be mentioned before the morning one? The Tur: an extra offering could be brought all day. The Beit Yosef (Rabbi Yosef Karo's commentary on the Tur): the morning one should still come first. The Magen Avraham: you already said the daily offering passage. If verses count as offerings, that counted too. The Kaf HaChaim (a Sephardic law commentary, early 1900s) gives that objection as another reason Sephardim skip these verses.

Tur and Beit Yosef, Orach Chaim 48, quoting Sefer HaManhig; Magen Avraham 48:2; Kaf HaChaim, Orach Chaim 421:3 and 48:6

Rosh Hashanah is the first of the month. Do I add the verses?

No. Mateh Efrayim (a guide to the High Holiday laws, about 200 years ago) rules that the Rosh Chodesh passage is not said on Rosh Hashanah. The Pri Megadim (Rabbi Yosef Teomim, 1700s) cites a reason from the Levush (by Rabbi Mordechai Yaffe, who died in 1612): on Rosh Hashanah, Rosh Chodesh is kept hidden. Either way, he writes, the custom is not to say it. The Shulchan Aruch rules the same for the Amidah: Rosh Chodesh is not mentioned. The Sefard Rosh Hashanah prayer book prints only the Shabbat verses here.

Mateh Efrayim 584:7; Pri Megadim, Eshel Avraham 48:3; Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim 582:6; Machzor Rosh Hashanah Sefard

Rosh Chodesh on Shabbat, or two days long. What changes?

When Rosh Chodesh falls on Shabbat, the Shabbat Siddur Sefard prints the Shabbat verses first, then the Rosh Chodesh verses. The Mishnah gives the same order for the offerings themselves: whatever comes more often goes first, so the Shabbat extra offering came before the Rosh Chodesh one. For a two-day Rosh Chodesh, this siddur says only "On Rosh Chodesh add." The Kaf HaChaim quotes one view that the verses are for the first day only. By the second day, that view says, it is already known.

Shabbat Siddur Sefard; Mishnah Zevachim 10:1; Kaf HaChaim, Orach Chaim 421:2

Sources

Show the 10 sources quoted on this page
  • Tur, Orach Chaim 48

    וטוב לומר אחר זה רבון העולמים אתה צויתנו להקריב קרבן התמיד במועדו... ועתה בעונותינו חרב המקדש ובטל התמיד... ואתה אמרת ונשלמה פרים שפתינו לכן יה"ר מלפניך שיהא זה חשוב ומקובל לפניך כאילו קרב התמיד במועדו ועמדתי על מעמדו

    It is good to say after this: Master of the worlds, You commanded us to bring the daily offering at its set time... And now, because of our sins, the Temple is destroyed and the daily offering has stopped... And You said: "We will pay with our lips in place of bulls." So may it be Your will that this be counted and accepted before You as if the daily offering was brought at its set time, and I stood at its post.

  • Hoshea 14:3

    קְחוּ עִמָּכֶם דְּבָרִים וְשׁוּבוּ אֶל ה׳ אִמְרוּ אֵלָיו כׇּל תִּשָּׂא עָוֺן וְקַח טוֹב וּנְשַׁלְּמָה פָרִים שְׂפָתֵינוּ

    Take words with you and return to Hashem. Say to Him: Forgive all wrong and accept what is good, and we will pay with our lips in place of bulls.

  • Midrash Tanchuma, Tzav 6

    וּמִי שֶׁאֵין לוֹ אֶחָד מִכָּל אֵלּוּ, יָבִיא סֹלֶת. וּמִי שֶׁאֵין לוֹ סֹלֶת וְלֹא כְּלוּם, יָבִיא דְּבָרִים... וְתֹאמַר שֶׁהוּא מְקֻבָּל. אָמַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא, הֵן, וּנְשַׁלְּמָה פָּרִים שְׂפָתֵינוּ

    Whoever has none of these should bring flour. And whoever has no flour, and nothing at all, should bring words... You may ask whether that is accepted. The Holy One, blessed be He, said: Yes. "We will pay with our lips in place of bulls."

  • Berakhot 17a

    רבון העולמים גלוי לפניך בזמן שבית המקדש קיים אדם חוטא ומקריב קרבן ואין מקריבין ממנו אלא חלבו ודמו ומתכפר לו ועכשיו ישבתי בתענית ונתמעט חלבי ודמי יהי רצון מלפניך שיהא חלבי ודמי שנתמעט כאילו הקרבתיו לפניך על גבי המזבח ותרצני

    Master of the worlds, You know that when the Temple stood, a person who sinned brought an offering. Only its fat and its blood were offered, and he was atoned. Now I have sat fasting, and my fat and my blood have grown less. May it be Your will that my fat and blood that have grown less be as if I had offered them before You on the altar, and may You accept me.

  • Megillah 3a

    כהנים בעבודתן ולוים בדוכנן וישראל במעמדן כולן מבטלין עבודתן ובאין לשמוע מקרא מגילה

    Kohanim at their service, Levites on their platform and Israelites at their post: all of them leave their service and come to hear the reading of the Megillah.

  • Yoma 9b

    אבל מקדש שני שהיו עוסקין בתורה ובמצות וגמילות חסדים מפני מה חרב מפני שהיתה בו שנאת חנם

    But the Second Temple, when they were busy with Torah, mitzvot and acts of kindness: why was it destroyed? Because there was hatred for no reason.

  • Talmud Yerushalmi, Yoma 1:1

    כָּל דּוֹר שֶׁאֵינוֹ נִבְנֶה בְיָמָיו מַעֲלִין עָלָיו כְּאִילּוּ הוּא הֶחֱרִיבוֹ

    Every generation in whose days it is not rebuilt is counted as if it destroyed it.

  • Berakhot 32b

    ואמר רבי אלעזר גדולה תפלה יותר מן הקרבנות... ואמר רבי אלעזר מיום שחרב בית המקדש ננעלו שערי תפלה... ואף על פי ששערי תפילה ננעלו שערי דמעה לא ננעלו

    Rabbi Elazar said: Prayer is greater than offerings... And Rabbi Elazar said: From the day the Temple was destroyed, the gates of prayer have been locked... And even though the gates of prayer were locked, the gates of tears were not locked.

  • Menachot 110a

    אמר ריש לקיש... כל העוסק בתורה כאילו הקריב עולה מנחה חטאת ואשם... אלא אמר רבא כל העוסק בתורה אינו צריך לא עולה (ולא חטאת) ולא מנחה ולא אשם

    Reish Lakish said... Whoever is busy with Torah is as if he brought a burnt offering, a grain offering, a sin offering and a guilt offering... Rava said: Whoever is busy with Torah does not need a burnt offering, a sin offering, a grain offering or a guilt offering.

  • Chullin 60b

    חזייה דלא קא מיתבא דעתה אמר הקב"ה הביאו כפרה עלי שמיעטתי את הירח

    He saw that she was not comforted. The Holy One, blessed be He, said: Bring an atonement for Me, because I made the moon smaller.

Every prayer in the siddur

The Opportunity Year · Tel Aviv, Israel

Learn like this for a year

Torah Tech is a beit midrash in Tel Aviv built for personal and professional growth: Torah learning at the center of every day, and internships at Israeli startups. It is the year a future Jewish leader realizes who he can become, and chooses to become it.