Why does the chazan tell everyone else to bless, instead of saying "let's bless"?
Barchu means "you all, bless." It sounds like the chazan is standing outside the group, giving orders. The Gemara noticed this kind of problem. In the same passage, Shmuel (a leading sage of the Gemara in Babylonia) teaches: a person should never take himself out of the group. At a meal, the Gemara concludes, "Barchu" is allowed, but "let us bless" is better, because it includes the speaker.
The Talmud Yerushalmi (the Gemara of the Land of Israel) asks our exact question. Before the Torah reading, people say "Barchu." Rabbi Avun answers: since he adds "hamevorach," he is not taking himself out. The Penei Moshe (a commentator on the Yerushalmi, 1700s) explains: "the blessed One" means blessed by every mouth, his included.
Later authorities argued about a new question: does the leader also need to say the answer himself? The Tur (a code of Jewish law from the 1300s) reports that the Maharam of Rothenburg (a leading German rabbi of the 1200s) said no, and Rabbi Yehudah of Barcelona said yes.
The Bach (Rabbi Yoel Sirkes, Poland, 1600s) explains what they disagree about. For the Maharam, saying "hamevorach" already counts as the leader blessing God. For Rabbi Yehudah, it only means "God, who is already blessed by others." So the leader has not blessed yet, and he must repeat the answer so he does not leave himself out.
Abudarham (a commentary on the prayers, Spain, around 1340) says the custom in his day followed the Maharam. The Shulchan Aruch (the main code of Jewish law) rules the other way: the leader repeats "Baruch Hashem hamevorach le'olam va'ed." The Mishnah Berurah (a central commentary on daily Jewish law, around 1900) gives the reason: to include himself among the people blessing. Listen for it tomorrow. He calls to the group, and then he joins it.
Berakhot 49b-50a,Talmud Yerushalmi, Berakhot 7:3, with Penei Moshe,Tur, Orach Chaim 57,Bach, Orach Chaim 57,Abudarham, Kaddish and Barchu,Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim 57:1 and 139:7,Mishnah Berurah 57:3Someone skipped one word and the whole shul yelled at him. Isn't that petty?
The Mishnah (the core collection of the Sages' teachings, edited around the year 200) records two versions of Barchu. Rabbi Akiva: "Barchu et Hashem," "bless Hashem." Rabbi Yishmael adds one word: "hamevorach," "the blessed One."
The Gemara tells a story. Rafram bar Pappa, a sage in Babylonia, was visiting a synagogue in a town called Avei Gibar. He got up to read from the Torah scroll, said "Barchu et Hashem," and stopped. No "hamevorach." The whole room called out the full line: "Barchu et Hashem hamevorach."
Rava (one of the leading sages of the Gemara) told him two things. Why get into an argument between sages? And besides, everyone's practice follows Rabbi Yishmael. Rashi (the classic commentator on the Gemara, France, 1000s) explains the first point: even Rabbi Akiva agrees that adding "hamevorach" is better. He only holds that it is not required. So the longer version works for both sides.
The Talmud Yerushalmi (the Gemara of the Land of Israel) has a similar story with a different ending. Rabbi Chiya bar Ashi said Barchu at the Torah without "hamevorach," and people wanted to silence him. Rav (a sage of the 200s who founded a great academy in Babylonia) said: leave him alone, he follows Rabbi Akiva.
So was the shouting petty? The sources hold both sides. Leaving out the word was a real opinion, Rabbi Akiva's, and Rav protected someone who followed it. But Rava did not back the shorter version either. His point was practical: the longer form satisfies both opinions, and it was everyone's practice, so there was no reason to step into the dispute.
Mishnah Berakhot 7:3,Berakhot 50a, with Rashi,Talmud Yerushalmi, Berakhot 7:3While the chazan sings Barchu, people mumble something under their breath. What is it?
It is a short paragraph that starts "Yitbarach veyishtabach," "blessed and praised be the name of the King of kings." Partway through, it echoes a line from the Levites' call in Nechemiah, "raised above every blessing and praise." The same verse closes the Vayevarech David prayer.
The Rema (Rabbi Moshe Isserles, who added Ashkenazi practice to the Shulchan Aruch) records the custom, from the Tur (a code of Jewish law from the 1300s): the chazan draws out Barchu with a tune, and the congregation says Yitbarach while he does.
The custom had critics. The Tur writes that it seemed better not to say it, so people could listen closely to the chazan. He compares it to the priestly blessing, where the Gemara concludes the congregation should not say verses while the kohanim bless. He also notes that Rav Amram Gaon (head of a great academy in Babylonia, whose order of prayer is one of the earliest we have) did not include it.
Then the Tur quotes his own father, the Rosh (Rabbeinu Asher, who led Jewish law in Germany and then Spain): "I have heard in all places" that people say it during Barchu, and that is why the chazan draws it out. He points to a parallel: Modim, where the chazan stretches the words so the congregation can say its own Modim.
The Mishnah Berurah (a central commentary on daily Jewish law, around 1900) sets a limit. Say it only during the tune, not while the chazan says the words. If he does not draw it out, it is better to stay quiet and listen so you can answer. The Aruch HaShulchan (a code of law by Rabbi Yechiel Michel Epstein, around 1900) says his community did not say it at all, because their chazan did not stretch out Barchu.
Siddur Sefard prints it in the Shabbat morning service, with the note: when the chazan says Barchu, the congregation says Yitbarach. The weekday page skips it.
Rema, Orach Chaim 57:1,Tur, Orach Chaim 57,Mishnah Berurah 57:5,Aruch HaShulchan, Orach Chaim 57:1,Siddur Sefard, Shabbat morning,Nechemiah 9:5