How can anyone pay God back? Isn't the question kind of silly?
The psalm opens with a question it seems to know has no good answer: "What can I give back to Hashem for all the good He has done for me?" God does not need anything from a person. So what is there to give?
Radak (Rabbi David Kimchi, a commentator on Tehillim in Provence, around 1200) takes the question at face value. All that was dealt out to me is on me to return, he says, if I can. But there was no merit in me that forced Him to do what He did. It was all kindness from Him.
The Mesillat Yesharim (The Path of the Just, a classic book on character from the 1700s) quotes this verse to describe a feeling many people know. A poor person who is handed a gift cannot help feeling ashamed, and the more kindness he gets, the more ashamed he feels. The same is true of anyone who sees clearly how much he has been given.
Then the psalm answers, and the answer is small: "I will raise a cup of rescues, and call out in Hashem's name." Rashi (the classic commentator, France, 1000s) says the cup is the wine poured with the thanksgiving offerings the speaker had promised, because the Levites, the singers in the Temple, sing only over wine. Radak also allows a plain reading: at a feast, raise a cup and thank Him in front of many people.
Midrash Tehillim (a collection of rabbinic teachings on Tehillim) notices which offering is named. Someone who owes a sin offering brings a sin offering. Here the speaker names no sin offering and no guilt offering, only a thanksgiving offering. In the Midrash's words: I owe You thanks.
The psalm says the vows will be paid "in front of all His people." Radak says these are vows made while on the run, and that the speaker calls many people to come to the offering and hear his thanks. Put together, the sources point to something small and public: thanks said out loud, with other people there, and promises kept.
Tehillim 116:12-14, 116:17,Radak and Rashi on Tehillim 116:12-14,Radak on Tehillim 116:17,Mesillat Yesharim 22:19,Midrash Tehillim 116:12Hallel is a happy song. Why is there a line about death in it?
The line is: "Yakar in Hashem's eyes is the death of His loyal ones." Many translations say "precious." But the commentators did not all read the word yakar the same way.
Rashi (the classic commentator, France, 1000s) says: God showed me that it is a hard and heavy thing in His eyes to put His loyal ones to death. Radak (Rabbi David Kimchi, a commentator on Tehillim in Provence, around 1200) compares yakar to Tehillim 72:14, where the same root says that the blood of the poor is dear in the king's eyes. He explains the line this way: killing His loyal ones before their time is a weighty matter to God. The speaker is one of them, so God saved him from death.
That makes this the voice of someone who was rescued. In the full psalm, a few verses earlier, he says: "You saved my soul from death" (116:8). On Rosh Chodesh that verse is skipped, so the line about death arrives without its setup.
Midrash Tehillim (a collection of rabbinic teachings on Tehillim) goes another way. It lists ten things Tanach calls yakar, ending with the death of the righteous. After a parable about a king, it has God say: it is hard in My eyes to tell Avraham that he must die, since he went into the furnace for My name. He says the same of Yitzchak, Yaakov, Moshe and David.
The Midrash then adds: the righteous would not die unless they asked for it themselves, and it points to verses where Avraham, Moshe, David and others speak of their own death. Since they ask, God says: let these step aside for those. If Avraham were still alive, how could Yitzchak lead? In this reading, the death of good people makes room for the next generation.
These readings do not agree on what the word means. They agree that God does not treat the death of good people as nothing. None of them says why the line sits in the middle of a happy Hallel. Radak comes closest: the speaker was near death, and was saved.
Tehillim 116:15,Rashi and Radak on Tehillim 116:15,Tehillim 72:14, 116:8,Midrash Tehillim 116:8Why does a psalm tell all the nations to praise God for what He did for us?
Tehillim 117 is the shortest of the 150 psalms, just two verses: "Praise Hashem, all you nations. Sing His praise, all you peoples. For His kindness has prevailed over us, and Hashem's truth is forever." It calls on the nations, then gives a reason that sounds like it is about someone else.
The Gemara (the rabbis' discussions built on the Mishnah) asks what business the nations have here. It passes on a teaching of Rabbi Yosei (a sage of the Mishnah), sent by his son: they should praise God for the mighty acts and wonders He did with them, and all the more so we, over whom His kindness has prevailed.
Midrash Tehillim (a collection of rabbinic teachings on Tehillim) tells it as a conversation. Rabbi Shimon asks his father, Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, the editor of the Mishnah, who "all nations" and "all peoples" are. The first group enslaved Israel. The second did not. The second group says: if those who enslaved Israel praise God, all the more so we. Then they begin: "For His kindness has prevailed over us."
On the first verse, the same Midrash tells of a man who asked Rabbi Yehoshua ben Chananya (a sage of the Mishnah) on what day the whole world bows to God together. His answer is rain: when it holds back everyone is distressed, and when it falls everyone is glad and praises God.
Radak (Rabbi David Kimchi, a commentator in Provence, around 1200) reads the psalm as being about the days of the Messiah. Two verses hint at two groups: Israel with their Torah, and everyone else with seven commandments. The kindness is bringing Israel out of exile, which the nations did not believe could happen.
Ibn Ezra (a Spanish commentator who died in the 1160s) gives a plainer reading. For him, "all nations" are the nations under King David's rule, and the kindness is God keeping everyone alive and fed. So the sources do not agree on who the nations are, who "us" is, or when this happens.
Tehillim 117:1-2,Pesachim 118b,Midrash Tehillim 117:1-2,Radak and Ibn Ezra on Tehillim 117